[Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance

[Matt Schulte]

Meaning Asterisk won't/can't take advantage of the four CPU's? Or it's
overkill for this scenario?

-----Original Message-----
From: joachim [mailto:zoachien at securax.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 12:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance



Send me the quad and i'll send you a 200$ pc to do this job.

The quad is heavily overpowered.

Joachim.

At 22:00 24/08/2004, you wrote:
>content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C48A15.130BF232"
>
>We're looking at implementing Asterisk in our department in the near
>future, we're looking at anywhere from 15-25 extensions. The machine we

>were looking at running this on was a Quad Xeon 450mhz (2MB L2 Cache)
w/ 
>1GB of ram. I've heard bad things about running Asterisk on SMP
machines? 
>Would we be running into any performance issues with this machine?
>
>Tim Jackson
>Network Engineer
>Angelina County, Texas
>(936)639-4827 office
>(936)414-6723 mobile
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com 
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users