[Asterisk-Users] Problem compiling chan_sccp

[Lex Lethol]

Julien,

Just to let you know that I manually included your patch and
everything compiled OK.
I'll begin testing now.

Thanks!

Lethol

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 02:02:58 -0600, Lex Lethol <lethol at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Julien,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.  I am currently trying to compile with gcc-2.96-113
> 
> I've been trying all day to get CVS from sf.net to try to compile from
> latest version.  Hope they fix it soon :S.
> 
> Lethol
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:35:11 +1000, Julien Goodwin
> <asterisk-lists at studio442.com.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:46:56PM -0500, Lex Lethol arranged a set of bits into the following:
> > > I recently bought a 7910.  I found out too late that it would not do
> > > SIP as I initially thought.  Anyway before ditchingit for a 7960 I
> > > wanted to try it out, I read that the guys at
> > > http://chan-sccp.sourceforge.net/ had done some improvements to the
> > > original chan_sccp driver and having 80% functionality with this
> > > model.
> > >
> > > I have not been able to compile their driver and keep getting the following:
> >
> > > chan_sccp$ make
> > > Now compiling .... sccp_channel.c           264 lines
> > > sccp_channel.c: In function `sccp_channel_endcall':
> > > sccp_channel.c:234: parse error before `timer'
> > > sccp_channel.c:237: `r1' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > sccp_channel.c:237: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > sccp_channel.c:237: for each function it appears in.)
> > > sccp_channel.c:238: `cmtime' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > make: *** [.tmp/sccp_channel.o] Error 1
> > Are you running GCC 2.95? If so there might still be a few cleanup
> > patches to fix compilation that haven't hit CVS yet. (And unfortunatly
> > anon CVS is down at the moment thanks to SourceForge...)
> >
> > Take a look at my patch available at:
> > http://www.czmok.de/devtrack/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000033
> >
> > (I run chan_sccp for cisco 12SP phones and that was the patch I needed
> > to get it working under GCC 2.95)
> >
> >
> >
>