[Asterisk-Users] G729 Codec

[steve at daviesfam.org]

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Steve Underwood wrote:

> It would probably help if you understood what that table means. It is 
> very misleading. G.729 has features to mitigate the awfulness of a lost 
> packet. It has nothing to help conceal lost packets really well. What I 
> said is correct. If you fudge over a lost G.711 packet it has less bad 
> effect than fudging over a lost G.729 packet. There is no missing 
> smoothing data, so at least the packets you have are handled properly.

In an appendix of the G711 spec there's a simple but good concealer for 
G711.  I wanted to implement it once Asterisk can take advantage.

Steve