[Asterisk-Users] Zaptel/PRI problem
reseaux
reseauxit at yahoo.it
Thu Apr 8 19:50:57 MST 2004
Dear Willy
i notice the same problem with my E100P using the latest cvs zaptel driver i
have try every type of config in /etc/zaptel.conf to check if i have missed
something in timing conf but nothing... Digium help... :-)
thanks in advance
Dimitri
On Thursday 08 April 2004 23:07, willy at yponeinc.com wrote:
> Chris,
> Thank you for posting this. Since it concerns my
> 'production' system, let me comment. After 'downshifting'
> to a previous release (for no good reason other than
> desperation and teh fact that an earlier list entry had
> commented that it cleared up the problems) I am sad to
> report that the system failed again.
> Miscellaneous throughout the day:
> Apr 8 13:41:27 WARNING[-1210639440]: PRI: Read on 32
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 13:41:27 NOTICE[-1210639440]: PRI got event: 8 on
> span 1
> Apr 8 13:41:27 WARNING[-1210639440]: PRI: Read on 32
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 13:41:27 NOTICE[-1210639440]: PRI got event: 6 on
> span 1
> Apr 8 13:42:07 WARNING[-1210639440]: PRI: Read on 32
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 13:42:07 NOTICE[-1210639440]: PRI got event: 8 on
> span 1
> Apr 8 16:44:01 WARNING[-1210631248]: PRI: Read on 34
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 16:44:01 NOTICE[-1210631248]: PRI got event: 6 on
> span 1
> Apr 8 16:44:01 WARNING[-1210631248]: PRI: Read on 34
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 16:44:01 NOTICE[-1210631248]: PRI got event: 6 on
> span 1
>
> Then this -- possibly not related ?
>
> Apr 8 16:51:45 WARNING[-1137157200]: Maximum retries
> exceeded on call a642d825c89f2f78 at 192.168.5.188 for seqno
> 102 (Request)
> Apr 8 16:51:45 WARNING[-1137157200]: Maximum retries
> exceeded on call a642d825c89f2f78 at 192.168.5.188 for seqno
> 103 (Request)
> Apr 8 16:51:45 WARNING[-1137157200]: Maximum retries
> exceeded on call a642d825c89f2f78 at 192.168.5.188 for seqno
> 104 (Request)
> Apr 8 16:51:46 WARNING[-1137157200]: Maximum retries
> exceeded on call a642d825c89f2f78 at 192.168.5.188 for seqno
> 105 (Request)
>
> And finally, I'll show you a RESTART log
>
> Apr 8 17:41:32 WARNING[-1085030272]: Ignoring port for now
> Apr 8 17:41:33 WARNING[-1085030272]: XXX I don't work right
> with non-full duplex sound cards XXX
> Apr 8 17:41:33 WARNING[-1189983312]: Read error on sound
> device: Resource temporarily unavailable
> Apr 8 17:41:33 ERROR[-1085030272]: Unable to load config
> iax1.conf
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 1
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 2
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 3
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 4
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 5
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 6
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 7
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 8
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 9
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 10
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 11
> Apr 8 17:41:38 WARNING[-1210963024]: PRI: Read on 32
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 17:41:38 NOTICE[-1210963024]: PRI got event: 5 on
> span 1
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 1: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 2: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 3: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 4: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 5: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 6: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 7: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 8: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 9: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 10: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1221452880]: Detected alarm on
> channel 11: Red Alarm
> Apr 8 17:49:10 WARNING[-1210963024]: PRI: Read on 32
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 17:49:10 NOTICE[-1210963024]: PRI got event: 4 on
> span 1
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 1
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 2
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 3
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 4
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 5
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 6
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 7
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 8
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 9
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 10
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1221452880]: Alarm cleared on
> channel 11
> Apr 8 17:49:18 WARNING[-1210963024]: PRI: Read on 32
> failed: Unknown error 500
> Apr 8 17:49:18 NOTICE[-1210963024]: PRI got event: 5 on
> span 1
>
> Can someone PLEASE interpret these messages?
> BTW: Calls & messages to digium support have gone unanswered
>
> :(
>
> TIA
> Willy
>
>
> ----- Original Message Follows -----
>
> > Just a note to the list, this problem still seems to exist
> > as late as 2004-04-07.
> >
> > Symptoms as we have seen it are this. System runs along
> > just fine, no errors. At some random interval, not based
> > upon time, and not apparently based upon call load, sound
> > drops out on all calls made over the Zap (T1 PRI
> > interface in our case T100P card). Any new calls made or
> > received from this time forward have no sound. The
> > problem is temporarily fixed by a shutdown and restart of
> > the asterisk code.
> >
> > This will be a major issue for anyone who is installing or
> > upgrading a system using a T1 card (our experience is
> > with the single port digium card, but previous postings
> > concerning this issue indicate the problem exists with
> > the 4 port as well).
> >
> > A temporary work around has been to fall back to the CVS
> > version 2004-03-05 10:28 for zaptel and asterisk. We've
> > just upgraded (downgraded) from the current versions to
> > the march 5th versions and will be watching to see if the
> > problem goes away.
> >
> > Here are some of the error messages we are seeing:
> >
> > Apr 5 07:57:01 WARNING[-1200284752]: PRI: Read on 31
> > failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 5 07:57:01
> > NOTICE[-1200284752]: PRI got event: 8 on span 1
> >
> > Apr 6 07:10:28 WARNING[-1200215120]: PRI: Read on 29
> > failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 6 07:10:28
> > NOTICE[-1200215120]: PRI got event: 5 on span 1
> >
> > Apr 6 14:22:23 WARNING[-1200260176]: PRI: Read on 29
> > failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 6 14:22:23
> > NOTICE[-1200260176]: PRI got event: 6 on span 1
> >
> > Apr 6 14:53:17 WARNING[-1200165968]: PRI: Read on 30
> > failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 6 14:53:17
> > NOTICE[-1200165968]: PRI got event: 5 on span 1
> >
> > Apr 7 15:00:26 WARNING[-1210471504]: PRI: Read on 64
> > failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 7 15:00:26
> > NOTICE[-1210471504]: PRI got event: 5 on span 1
> >
> > Apr 7 20:33:52 WARNING[-1210508368]: PRI: Read on 55
> > failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 7 20:33:52
> > NOTICE[-1210508368]: PRI got event: 8 on span 1
> >
> > Apr 8 09:42:15 WARNING[-1210725456]: PRI: Read on 32
> > failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 8 09:42:15
> > NOTICE[-1210725456]: PRI got event: 5 on span 1
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> > On 03:14 AM 3/30/2004, Tais M. Hansen wrote:
> > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >Hi.
> > >
> > >I'm getting the following error at random intervals on
> >
> > my TE410P with Asterisk
> >
> > >CVS-03/30/04-11:49:01-CEST.
> > >
> > >I have two spans active, one connected to my Telco, the
> >
> > other to a Siemens
> >
> > >PABX. Both spans display this behavior at random
> >
> > intervals.
> >
> > >All calls are dropped when this happens. Spans are not
> >
> > necessarily in use when
> >
> > >this happens.
> > >
> > >
> > >Mar 30 12:01:41 WARNING[81926]: chan_zap.c:6017
> >
> > zt_pri_error: PRI: Read on 72
> >
> > >failed: Unknown error 500
> > >Mar 30 12:01:41 NOTICE[81926]: chan_zap.c:6733
> >
> > pri_dchannel: PRI got event: 4
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> Willy Wouters
> ypOne Publishing
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list