chan_h323 vs asterisk-oh323 (Was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco to asterisk termination with h323 and g729 finally works.)

[Nick]

Wonderfull, since you've had so many terrible problems I'm sure you'll
just jump at the chance to mention all of them in enough detail to 1.
debug and 2. fix.  So what are all these issues and what steps can I
take to reproduce them?
	Thanks
		Nick
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 10:19:05AM +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> If it was possible to get any support at all from Jeremy (or others),
> I'd be glad to use it. I have sent numerous reports with where it failed
> and what I did to remedy this without getting any response. With
> developers this arrogant, chan_h323 should be removed from the asterisk
> tree, unless the code support is improved.
> 
> roy
> 
> On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 19:27, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
> > I would like to hear from anyone else that has real world experiences 
> > with both chan_h323 and asterisk-oh323.
> > 
> > Be brutal.  I want to know the gory details, so we can stop any future 
> > pissing matches from even starting by having everything publicly 
> > documented for all newbies.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremy McNamara
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users