chan_h323 vs asterisk-oh323 (Was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco to asterisk termination with h323 and g729 finally works.)

[Adam Hart]

> > I've used both, I find chan_h323 more robust as it does less. Given it
uses
> > *'s rtp, means less chance of errors but also inherits problems of rtp.c
> > (inability to set payload) My chan_oh323 still crashes on exit which
> > concerns me on the quality. (I don't really care if it's on exit).
Having
>
> So lets fix it!
> I use asterisk-oh323 without problems for my setup.
> If you provide the needed information I can fix it.
>
I believe it was due to adding different types of G.723 capabilities, I
don't use H.323 anymore so it isn't an issue for me.

> > said that, the config options in chan_oh323 are great - the ability to
turn
> > on and off fast start and change the packet payload sizes is handy. My
main
> > problem with chan_h323 was G.729, which caused me switching to
chan_oh323
>
> I'm using chan_oh323 to pass through many G.729 calls to/from
> Cisco 17xx boxes without a single problem.
>
Hence why I said I switched to chan_oh323