chan_h323 vs asterisk-oh323 (Was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco to asterisk termination with h323 and g729 finally works.)

[Lubomir Christov]

Jeremy McNamara wrote:
> 
> Lubomir Christov wrote:
> 
>> BUT I have the say that I have the same opinion as martin 
>> (martin at agilecall.com): "Although personally I would prefer oh323 for 
>> its very well described config file for now winner is chan_h323"
> 
> 
> 
> Again, what is not clear about h323.conf?  It follows the other Asterisk 
> channel driver config methods.
> 
> 
> I am looking for specifics here, not just generalizations. 
> 

There are some missing useful features in chan_h323 (which are present 
in chan_oh323)

1. missing jitter buffer - I know that this is because of the asterisk 
rtp limits, It don't have such a feature

2. LogLevel/LogFile feature in config - right now (as I know) if you 
don't start asterisk on console (asterisk -vvvvc) you can't receive the 
trace output from chan_h323 and it is impossible to redirect the trace 
output to some file from h323.conf (like 
libLogFile=/var/log/asterisk/oh323 is doing it)

Lubo