[Asterisk-Users] Distintive Ring on x100p

[Brian West]

1 dont start in debug mode.. you will get lost in all the garbage

start with safe_asterisk

then asterisk -r
set verbose 4

call in to each number
and watch for the DEBUG: lines after starting simple switch on blah

Then it should print like

DEBUG: 0
DEBUG: 0
DEBUG: 0

It might even print them 6 times instead of 3..

Ie if it prints

DEBUG: 327
DEBUG: 0
DEBUG: 0

then that ring is 327,0,0  ( but to be safe lets round it to 5's) and make
it 325,0,0  only have to hit within 10 +/- for it to match.

bkw

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert Boardman wrote:

> Thanks again Brian, one more question if i may ( soory for the hand holding)
>
>
> I've added the line below should the information show up when I am in
> asterisk vvvvvvvvvvvvgc,
>
> what do I have to do to get the correct info
>
> thanks again for all your help
>
> Robb
>
>
> Brian West wrote:
>
> >Thats one thing that needs to be added to the patch.. I did this areound
> >line 4471 in chan_zap.c
> >
> >ast_verbose( VERBOSE_PREFIX_3 "DEBUG: %d\n", curRingData[counter1]);
> >
> >bkw
> >
> >On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert Boardman wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Thanks for your help Brian
> >>
> >>how would you come the the values required for the distincive ring?
> >>
> >>Robb
> >>
> >>Brian West wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>cd /usr/src
> >>>patch -p0 < file.diff
> >>>
> >>>bkw
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert Boardman wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>me too
> >>>>
> >>>>being a patch newbie how do you apply the patch
> >>>>
> >>>>and
> >>>>
> >>>>are the three comma seperated values  equivalent to the dron and drof on the modems?
> >>>>
> >>>>I ask because the dron and droff, using my modem arent always say 5, sometimes there 4
> >>>>
> >>>>Robb
> >>>>--- Original Message ---
> >>>>From: John Vozza <john at netrom.com>
> >>>>Sent: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 06:43:03 -0500 (EST)
> >>>>To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> >>>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Distintive Ring on x100p
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Brian West wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000504
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I have been testing this patch today.  Works great.  Just wondered if
> >>>>>>anyone else was intrested in such a beast.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>YES, very!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>John
> >>>>>
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>