Please remove H.323 from Asterisk (was H.323 support is distrubuted with Asterisk (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_oh323.so: Segmentation Fault))

[mike at pellatt.co.uk]

Sheesh. I only joined here a few days ago and already there's a flame 
war.

Look, to remove your name from the list is easy. It tells you where to 
go to manage your subscription down there at the bottom.

If you want another mailing list, why not go to yahoo!! or topica and 
set one up, or set one up yourself. It ain't rocket science with 
mailman. Even an idiot like me has managed it.

As for GPL/Copyright etc., I have my own views over what appears to have 
been going on. But I'm going to keep them to myself. All I will say is 
that there's a whole lot of misunderstanding about it going on all over 
the place. Not just here.

Now, please, please, please, as plenty of others have said, let's drop 
it. Or I for one will unsubscribe, get * running by reading the source, 
Luke, but not be able to share my experiences with anyone else. At which 
point we all lose.

Mike Pellatt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hkumar [mailto:hkumar at spgsolutions.com]
> Sent: 23 May 2003 13:36
> To: asterisk-users
> Subject: Re: Please remove H.323 from Asterisk (was H.323 support is
> distrubuted with Asterisk (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_oh323.so:
> Segmentation Fault))
> 
> 
> I really would like my name to be removed from this list.
> 
> MARK: can you please start a bit more serious list only for 
> people who are
> really interested in doing something instead. e.g.
> asterisk-serious-users-only at lists-digium.com
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "diana" <diana at lucky.tts.ro>
> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 8:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Please remove H.323 from Asterisk (was H.323 support is
> distrubuted with Asterisk (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_oh323.so:
> Segmentation Fault))
> 
> 
> > > > P.S. Roy, RTFM.  Other's have and they've gotten it to work.
> > >
> > > A segfault is not my fault. It's caused by the developer, 
> you, who've
> done
> > > something wrong. I've used the exact same versions of 
> pwlib and openh323
> as
> > > you're developing on, but I've used Debian instead of RedHat, and
> therefore
> > > you don't want to support this. This arrogancy is 
> something an open
> source
> > > project shouldn't have.
> >
> > You arogant like hell.
> > You should learn to respect what you get. Jeremy haven't 
> been paid by you.
> > Open source work because people pay tehnical support. Him 
> is not in any
> > way not even moral to help you. If him is helping you, then 
> you should
> > take him and send him money or whatever you want.
> > Because if him wasn't write the code you will have nothing.
> > Did you write any part of asterisk? Why should anyone 
> consider to give you
> > something if you haven't give anything back. I think you 
> should delete you
> > asterisk and go to buy something else. For people like you 
> world have
> > invented Cisco, to take all your money. Go and spend money 
> on something
> > else if you don't want asterisk.
> > If you haven't give something why do you ask?
> >
> > > Mark: Please remove chan_h323, will you?
> >
> > I really hope that Mark will ignore you, because your 
> request si stupid
> > and whithout any fundation.
> > You want other people to lose if you can't handle your problem.
> >
> >
> > Btw i don't know if Jeremy ever mentioned who was the 
> problem with his
> > code, but you will see that Jeremy was also write support 
> for H323 for
> > bayonne. Him was also found bugs into openh323, and have talk with
> > developers to fix it.
> > Yes, H323 have segfaults, but you know what, seems that all 
> of them are
> > from malloc, and Michael was told me that him was fix this 
> by using glibc
> > 2.2.5 from Debian. Jeremy dosen't have your problems, and him is
> > supporting debian, because the problems are from glibc.
> >
> > > roy
> >
> > Diana
> >
> > P.S. Get your pants on.