[Asterisk-Users] SIPPROXD for SIP thru NAT

[Michael Bielicki]

Could we have a place to put all gear that works with * via NAT and which one 
does not ?

On Friday 09 May 2003 7:24 am, John Todd wrote:
> OK, Asterisk does that out of the box.  Install it, read the docs,
> and jump in the IRC channel when you get to the point where you think
> it doesn't work.  :)
>
> JT
>
> >Froilan and John
> >
> >
> >Jasomi is a little more the 10k buck for 25 simultaneous calls , but 
> > works fanthastic what I need is a "device" that works as a STUN SERVER
> > this fits exatly but the ATA-186 does not support STUN , what I need is
> > to have NOTHING on the far end (customer) only the ATA-186 and nothing to
> > confiure on the far end, just sell an ATA (for example) at best buy ,
> > plug and play (obioulsy  a LAB-Config previous), and can be able to
> > receive and send calls from that side.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Humberto
> >
> >-----Mensaje original-----
> >De: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> >[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com]En nombre de Florian
> >Overkamp
> >Enviado el: Jueves, 08 de Mayo de 2003 05:25 a.m.
> >Para: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> >Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIPPROXD for SIP thru NAT
> >
> >
> >John,
> >
> >thanks very much for your elaboration on this issue.
> >
> >At 00:59 8-5-2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >>If you're asking about proxy-to-proxy functionality, I have no idea. But
> >>if all you're concerned about is NAT'ed UA's, then I'd say that Asterisk
> >>is there right now.  There are other issues which make make it less
> >>reliable than the Jasomi solution (there are others in this market, as
> >>well) but that is not the specific question you asked.
> >
> >True, but can we identify these issues ? I'd like to compose a checklist
> > of requirements or caveats regarding voip-customers in a rogue
> > environment (i.e. no control over NAT etc).
> >
> >>hash the "open source" vs. "commercial" product argument
> >>here.  Competition is good, no matter what the force is pushing the
> >>process.  However, the market for NAT traversal devices is pretty
> >>specialized and technical, and Asterisk will make big inroads with the
> >>savvy technicians who install that equipment.  I'm a case in point - I
> >
> >Point taken.
> >
> >>Sorry for the long-winded talk; I have nothing better to do while waiting
> >>for downloads/compiles right now.  :)
> >
> >No problem at all - I'm very happy to think deeply into issues such as
> >this, since they closely relate to the levels of support one would need to
> >supply to voip-customers.
> >
> >Florian
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users