[Asterisk-Users] Re: chan_h323 inclusion in Asterisk (was Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux distro fixation?)

[Sunday Folayan]

Sorry about the ignorance.

Sunny.

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Michael Manousos wrote:

> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:33:07 +0300
> From: Michael Manousos <manousos at inaccessnetworks.com>
> Reply-To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: chan_h323 inclusion in Asterisk (was
>     Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linux distro fixation?)
>
> Sunday Folayan wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Michael Manousos wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Only a disclaimed driver can go into Asterisk CVS.  Jeremy has completed
> >>>the disclaimer, but I have not yet received one from Michael Mansous, so
> >>
> >>We are not thinking about disclaiming the driver at this
> >>particular time, but the code will always be available from
> >>our site.
> >>
> >>Since there are many users that want to use or already
> >>use H.323 for Asterisk, it would be nice to exist some
> >>link on the main (new) Asterisk site. Like a section with
> >>add-ons and the like. This will make things easier.
> >>
> >>Michael Manousos.
> >
> >
> > Michael, why not talk to one of those folks in suit? If you will not
> > disclaim and make it easy for us all to have your codes in the CVS and
> > easy to download and integrate with *, just go ahead and put a price tag
>
> You probably did't read the email well, so I will repeat that the
> code will always be available from our site with the current
> license (GPL). The other stuff about price tag and folks in suit
> are part of your ignorance about the subject.
>
> Michael Manousos.
>
>
> > on it, so that folks can know how much to spill for it. I am much more
> > comfortable, if I know the destination. A stitch in time saves nine.
> >
> > I don't really think the link from the main asterisk website is needed.
> > Since we are not making it easier to install, why make it easier to find?
> >
> > Greetings:
> >