[Asterisk-Users] SNOM 100 vs SNOM 200??

[T Aksoy]

I prefer the 200, mainly because of its more comforable handset. It feels
more like a conventional telephone.

Most of the 200's configuration is done via the web interface, whereas the
100 has a lot more control via the lcd display. Also, the 200 supports an
external headset. If you want to test h323 and sip, then be aware that on
the 200 you will need to download an h323 image, whereas on the 100 it's
just a case of selecting "H323" from the menu and rebooting.

There should only be a pricing difference of around £20 (or $30). In the UK,
we sell the SNOM 100s for £189 and 200s for £210.

Thanks
Tan



----- Original Message -----
From: "WipeOut ." <wipeout at linuxmail.org>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 100 vs SNOM 200??


Hi,

I have more or less decided to do with the SNOM phones for the next stage of
testing with Asterisk becasue they seem to be the best value for money and
have support for the GSM codec and easy upgrades.. But now I have to decied
wheather to get the 100 or 200 and if its the 200 then I need to have some
justification for the extra cost..

Can someone who knows these 2 phones tell me what the main differences are??

Just looking at the datasheets they look very much the same.. Looking at the
prices they are not.. :)

Also tell me which you prefer irrespective of the price..

Thanks.
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users