[Asterisk-Users] compression quality of wav voicemail attachments

[John Harragin]

I didn't mean mp3 or ogg for playback, but emailed voicemail files. The
original wav paths could be could be dumped into a low priority encoding
queue (for that matter any additional conversion could be done in this
fashion).

By the way do all holded channels hear the same signal?

John

> Actually I'm considering dropping mp3 codec support from Asterisk (of
> course, we would still keep the "music on hold" and so on which use
> mpg123).  The reason is that mp3 is relatively expensive (even in decode)
> and isn't really appropriate due to its large frame size and high bit rate
> for telephony.
>
> Mark
>
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, John Harragin wrote:
>
> > Just out of curiosity, has anyone been working on adding ogg or mp3
encoding
> > to voicemail? Lame sounds quite good at low bit rates. Anyway, either of
> > these would probably be good for the email message distribution.
> >
> > John
> >
> > >> It appears that the pharsing for the wav49 extension which is .WAV
isn't
> > >> correct in app_voicemail.c. I can't attach the wav49 format although
gsm
> > and
> > >> wav work fine.
> >
> > >What about just putting "WAV" instead of wav49?
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail was scanned and found clean by Monroe-Woodbury CSD
Antivirus.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> This e-mail was scanned and found clean by Monroe-Woodbury CSD Antivirus.