[Asterisk-Users] Minimum budget question ...

tim.mcqueen at qualisys.biz tim.mcqueen at qualisys.biz
Mon Jun 30 13:56:04 MST 2003


That reminds me, Cisco has a new device out, the IAD2430 that has T1
ports VWIC, and FXS ports.  It will proably cost a bundle, though.
Looks like the IAD2432 will handle 24 analog ports, up to two Data T1s
and a voice T1 using the VWIC port.  Supports SIP and MGCP.

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Michael Kane 
	Sent: Mon 6/30/2003 2:38 PM 
	To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Minimum budget question ...
	
	

	The Cisco 242x (20 or 21), has a 24 port analog interface that
supports 16
	FXS and 8 FXO.  I've delpoyed hundreds of these IAD's signaling
with MGCP.
	Not sure if it supports SIP yet.  Hope this helps...
	
	Mike
	
	Michael Kane
	To-Talk Communications LLC.
	37 Sandusky Dr.
	Wareham, Ma. 02571
	508-295-2826
	----- Original Message -----
	From: "Andy Powell" <andy at beagles-den.demon.co.uk>
	To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
	Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:51 PM
	Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Minimum budget question ...
	
	
	> Hi Tan,
	>
	> Thanks for the reply. I'll end up asking a load more questions
now...
	>
	> What sort of prices are we talking about for the 24 port
	> VoIP gateway?
	>
	> I assume that each port is individually addresable by *?
	>
	> As I recall the 24 port gateways tend to be terminated at the
FXS side
	> as some 'wierd' connector (wierd in that it's not rj45/11) do
you just
	> wire this to a patch panel?
	>
	> What codec is in use to get all 24 ports 'running' at the same
time..G729?
	> Does this cause problems since iirc * needs to run in console
mode for
	> the G729 codec to work properly
	>
	> Thanks for the info... interesting site too :D
	>
	> Andy
	>
	>
	>
	> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
	>
	> On 30/06/2003 at 19:21 Tan Aks wrote:
	>
	> >Hi,
	> >
	> >We provide asterisk-based solutions to customers based in the
uk. One of
	> >our
	> >customers (9 users) is trialling our low-end solution which
comprises of
	a
	> >box with 2 x X100P (analogue line) cards installed, and a
voip carrier
	for
	> >outgoing calls. This customer intends to have 13 extensions
in his "live"
	> >scenario. The way to use multiple analogue phones is:
	> >
	> >        1) get a T100P card and use a T1 channel bank sourced
from the US
	> >        2) use a couple of TDM400P cards to give 8
extensions, and use IP
	> >phones for the other extensions
	> >        3) use a voip gateway to provide up to 24 x analogue
extensions
	per
	> >IP address. VoIP gateways are commonly available and convert
analogue
	lines
	> >into a SIP/H323 VoIP stream.
	> >
	> >You can get an E1 terminated with an RJ45. If you have a coax
	termination
	> >then you can use a balun to get rj45 connectivity.
	> >
	> >Hope that helps.
	> >Tan (telappliant.com)
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >----- Original Message -----
	> >From: "Andy Powell" <andy at beagles-den.demon.co.uk>
	> >To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
	> >Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:26 PM
	> >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Minimum budget question ...
	> >
	> >
	> >Tim,
	> >
	> >a good comprehensive answer to the question...certainly gave
me a few
	> >things
	> >to think about. I do have a few questions though, since I'm
in Europe.
	> >
	> >Has anyone in Europe set up something equivalent to what Tim
suggested?
	> >
	> >What sort of prices did it work out at?
	> >
	> >How did you solve the channel bank 'issue' in Europe?
	> >
	> >I keep reading that E1 lines are coax terminated, is this
correct or do
	you
	> >usually get a choice from your teleco?
	> >
	> >Were there any other issues to contend with?
	> >
	> >I'd certainly be interested in the experiences of anyone in
Europe...
	> >
	> >Thanks
	> >
	> >Andy
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >On 30/06/2003 at 10:55 tim.mcqueen at qualisys.biz wrote:
	> >
	> >>If this is for commercial use, especially if you are going
to be selling
	> >>this solution, I would suggest that you don't even offer the
choice of
	> >>analog lines except in the smallest of offices.  Unless you
like to
	> >>spend a lot of unbillable time supporting them :)
	> >>
	> >
	> >
	> >
	> >_______________________________________________
	> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
	> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
	> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	> >
	> >
	> >_______________________________________________
	> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
	> >Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
	> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	>
	>
	>
	> _______________________________________________
	> Asterisk-Users mailing list
	> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
	> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	>
	
	_______________________________________________
	Asterisk-Users mailing list
	Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
	http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 8938 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030630/c977ad82/attachment.bin


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list