[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk VS. Bayonne

[Uriel Carrasquilla]

I certainly hope that there is more to their difference.  I have not
compared both of them recently but I did back during summer 99.  Then in my
mind I decided that the one that I could get working first would stay.  I am
still with asterisk.  I found that Mark was more than willing to help to
help me get going.  Bayonne wanted consulting fees that were expensive on my
zero budget.
Asterisk back in 99 had its problem but it was promissing:
1) inexpensive Zapata cards
2) very effective, simple communication protocol (iax) that would work over
firewalls and nat.
3) very straight forward dial plan (extensions.conf)
4) gno-phone was on the works.

Regards,
Uriel

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of James
Sizemore
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:28 AM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk VS. Bayonne


Asterisk, kind of has support for SIP, Bayonne has none at all. (Last
time I checked.)

K a z wrote:

>
> Could someone familiar with both break down the most memorable pro's &
> con's and why you have decided to use Asterisk?
>
> Thanks
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users