[Asterisk-Users] Wish-to-have in Asterisk

[Humberto Atristain V.]

Thanks Steve..

Regading the HOW SMALL I think the question is HOW MUCH $ , I`m thinking of a 
more-less $200 or $300 usd  BOX working as a Broadband router , 2 NIC`s , 
asterisk on it, With Optional a WIC like slot to put fxo's or Fxs. (this is my 
wish)

In my personal case we are service providers mostly for SMB mayb some 
corporates and this guys do not want a "PC Like" Gateway they like to 
see "CISCO Like" Boxes but they dont want to pay CISCO`s  (Ohh this customers) 

Again Sorry I`m not so technical I`m in Comercial area. 


regards

Humberto


Mensaje citado por: Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>:

> On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 17:33, Humberto Atristain V. wrote:
> > Dear Pals
> > 
> > I think all of us in this business (or most) looking at the Corn
> Flakes Back 
> > Side , Wish to find a NAT Friendly VOIP solution. Thats ridiculous I
> know, but 
> > what about this wish list (Personal Point of view)
> 
> IAX is that protocol. Works out of the box across a NAT. It does this
> by
> putting the entire call on a single port and the machine behind a NAT
> does register updates around every 60 seconds. This keeps any half
> decent NAT solution happy with the port staying up and working.
> 
> > Upnp support for Asterisk
> 
> What would this do for asterisk? I'll have to claim ignorance as to
> what
> you would accomplish with it.
> 
> > STUN Support for Asterisk
> 
> This would be okay, as well as the proxy support. Of course now that
> FWD
> and IAXTEL are routing together, this will elliminate my needs for
> SIP.
> 
> > Small Embedded Asterisk (just to redirect IAX) SIP-IAX , h.323-IAX or
> 
> > something like that , on the End Point.
> > As a Nat friendly end point
> 
> How small are you thinking? What type of media are you thinking of
> putting this on? Looking at my current phone routing machine thats
> only
> duty is to terminate my PRI and route some calls to a channel bank in
> the colo rack, and send the rest down our data T1 to our office
> asterisk
> machine. On this machine It currently is taking 1gig of drive space,
> but
> of that 245M is my src directory, 119M is documentation, I have 122M
> in
> my postgres database area, and 242M in my home directory. 
> 
> If I remove all those spots I mentioned above, and uninstall postgres,
> I'd almost be able to stick this setup on a 256meg CF card. This is a
> default debian install with all the dev packages to compile asterisk
> too. So I bet I could easily build a machine that would do what you
> want. Why does that need to be part of the core asterisk project?  
> 
> > the most diffuctult
> > 
> > Integrate IAX to RFCXXXXXX SIP , or H.323 to be recognized as
> Standard. 
> > 
> > Go to SIP Interop forums and look at the possibility to integrate IAX
> to SIP( 
> > or something like that)
> > 
> > Manufacturers include IAX as Sip, MGCP, H.323
> 
> This is more market pressure than a project goal. If there is enough
> people asking for that feature, then more than just the Snom folks
> will
> look into providing it.
> 
> > Mark and all the others, May be a good idea to start a WISH LIST for
> asterisk? 
> > Not for the experts in development, Just let comon Asterisk Users
> (Like Me) to 
> > put my bit to this interesting proyect. 
> > 
> > So if there`s a specialized developer get his Wish-List Point and
> start over 
> > and move forward this proyect. step by step
> 
> -- 
> Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 



Humberto Atristain V.