@sterisk also works....Re: [Asterisk-Users] First Test Message for new Mail Server

[John Lange]

Personally I think astmasters is a little too close to assmasters for my
liking. :P

I picture the following conversation:

Q: "Are you a member of astmasters?"

A: "My god man no! I'm straight!"


John

On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 09:51, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 09:29, Steve Kann wrote:
> > I think that asterisk-users and asterisk-developers would make sense to
> > people used to these conventions.
> > 
> > But if you're going to eschew convention, go all the way, and make sure
> > you call the developers' list astmasters at digium.com.
> 
> I guess that depends on what you consider a developer, or what the term
> astmaster refers to. I think I remember the first time I heard the term
> astmaster, it was used as a parrallel to webmaster. So I would consider
> a astmaster to be just a person who watches over a system and keeps the
> configs straight. Most webmasters do not contribute to the code base,
> nor feature list of the server they run. Most of the ones I've been in
> contact with(very small subset of the webmaster population) wouldn't
> even want to be part of a mailing list that discussed much of the inner
> workings of the server they run. They tend to be a grade above end user
> in this sense. 
> 
> I also tend to think of developers as those who are interested in the
> inner workings of the system, and may or may not contribute code.
> Granted almost every person who qualifies for the term astmaster right
> now is probably a developer in some way, it probably won't be that way
> soon.    
> 
> -- 
> Steven Critchfield  <critch at basesys.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users