[asterisk-security] [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] ADSI and Crypto backwards compatibility with 1.6.2
Kevin Fleming
kpfleming at digium.com
Wed Aug 25 16:42:39 CDT 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#review2630
-----------------------------------------------------------
/branches/1.8/apps/app_adsiprog.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5751>
In all of these cases, there doesn't seem to be any harm in populating the required_resource field in every build, even if that particular system won't use it. I'd honestly prefer a solution that was derived directly from the MODINFO blocks, so that it couldn't get out of sync, but I understand that would be quite complex to build.
/branches/1.8/apps/app_followme.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5752>
Unrelated change.
/branches/1.8/apps/app_queue.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5753>
Was this missed in the previous conversion? It doesn't look like this new code makes the dependency less strong... the previous changes to optional_api did that.
/branches/1.8/channels/chan_mgcp.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5754>
Is this true? Does res_pktccops use optional_api? If not, then chan_mgcp shouldn't be buildable if res_pktccops isn't built as well. Delaying the problem until runtime (as a loading error) doesn't really help the system administrator much.
/branches/1.8/include/asterisk/module.h
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5755>
Make this field already exist; changing the composition of an API structure based on platform dependencies seems very unsafe.
/branches/1.8/main/loader.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5756>
What will happen if loading the dependency module fails here?
/branches/1.8/pbx/pbx_loopback.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5757>
Unrelated change.
/branches/1.8/pbx/pbx_realtime.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/#comment5758>
Unrelated change.
- Kevin
On 2010-08-24 21:02:08, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2010-08-24 21:02:08)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> In 1.6.2 and previous, res_adsi and res_crypto used stub files to allow them not to be loaded. We got rid of the stubs in favor of the optional_api approach. Now people who are upgrading, who previously noload'ed those modules AND are on a platform which does not support optional_api (i.e. gcc 4.1) (e.g. RHEL, Centos 5) are complaining that the easy upgrade path is broken.
>
> This patch forces those broken platforms to automatically load the dependencies, when required by a loaded module.
>
>
> This addresses bug 17707.
> https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17707
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /branches/1.8/apps/app_adsiprog.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/apps/app_followme.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/apps/app_getcpeid.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/apps/app_queue.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/apps/app_speech_utils.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/apps/app_stack.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/apps/app_voicemail.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/channels/chan_agent.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/channels/chan_dahdi.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/channels/chan_iax2.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/channels/chan_mgcp.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/channels/chan_sip.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/funcs/func_aes.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/include/asterisk/module.h 283524
> /branches/1.8/main/loader.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/pbx/pbx_dundi.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/pbx/pbx_loopback.c 283524
> /branches/1.8/pbx/pbx_realtime.c 283524
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/876/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> noloaded modules on a Centos 5 machine, verified they loaded when a dependent module was loaded, either at boot time, or later, at CLI request (i.e. the 'module load' command).
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tilghman
>
>
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
More information about the asterisk-security
mailing list