[asterisk-scf-committee] Asterisk SCF 1.0 Feature List, and progress towards it

[Phillips, Wesley]

I also agree with Kevin's assessment. I too have pulled the sources and compiled them. Unfortunately I haven't had the spare time necessary to pull all the required information together to actually make something functional like Andrew has done, but hope to very soon here. I look forward to the "polishing" process that will occur in the weeks leading up to AstriCon, which should make the process easier to digest and make me a more productive consumer of SCF.

Thanks for all the hard work, Digium folks! My team and I are excited about the possibilities that SCF brings and eagerly await the 1.0 release.

Wesley Phillips
Unified Communications Engineer
(832)668-2553 | wphill04 at harris.com

 


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-scf-committee-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-scf-committee-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Latham
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 7:41 AM
To: Asterisk SCF Steering Committee discussions
Subject: Re: [asterisk-scf-committee] Asterisk SCF 1.0 Feature List, and progress towards it

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at digium.com> wrote:
> https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/TOP/Asterisk+SCF+1.0+Target+Feature+List+by+Milestone
>
> This list, including milestones 1, 2 and 3, represents what was agreed upon
> by the committee members early this year. The list was intended to ensure
> that when Asterisk SCF 1.0 was released, that it would have enough
> functionality to be interesting and useful to potential users, so that they
> would start trying it out and learning how to develop on/for it.
>
> As I said on the call yesterday, it's not surprising that development has
> taken longer than expected, although we've made a significant amount of
> progress. Today, we're expecting to have the milestone 2 list completed by
> the end of this month, and then spend the next few weeks (before AstriCon)
> testing, polishing, documenting, etc.
>
> What this means is that we need an assessment from the committee about
> whether the items that were placed into milestone 3 are *necessary* for a
> suitable and usable 1.0 release, or whether it's acceptable to proceed with
> the milestone 2 list and build the milestone 3 features for a 1.1 release.
>
> Give us your honest opinion: what's important here is that the 1.0 release
> be substantial enough to allow interested potential users to make serious
> use of it and learn from it. It doesn't have to be 100% competitive and at
> feature-parity with other platforms, of course... but we don't want
> potential users to find it so lacking that they just shelve it and wait for
> another release.
>
> --
> Kevin P. Fleming
> Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
> Jabber: kfleming at digium.com | SIP: kpfleming at digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
> Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

I agree with your summary Kevin. Honestly the direction listed on the
wiki looks great.  Milestone 3 is optional (aka 1.1, 1.2) type stuff.
As far as the discussion about the installation documentation.  I have
installed and played with Asterisk SCF with the info on the Wiki.  I
think that we only need to broaden the target audience for the
documentation.  The info is all there, just takes some skill to get it
done.


-- 
~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lathama at gmail.com http://lathama.net ~

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-scf-committee