[asterisk-r2] Asterisk 1.6.2 is out - oficial MFC/R2 release

[Alexandre Cavalcante Alencar]

Hi Anton, goof night

For a long time I am using the 1.6.2 version because of MFC/R2 (I used
1.4 version with patch, but decided to try the version that will be
officially supported for now on).

There are few differences between 1.4 and 1.6.2 for my usage, the most
relevant is MFC/R2. This two versions have almost the same Service
Life, so I decided to get 1.6.2 as base. Everything going fine for a
while (since pre-rc).

Regards

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Anton Krall <antonkrall at gmail.com> wrote:
> SO would you rather use 1.6 instead of 1.4?
>
>
>> From: Alexandre Cavalcante Alencar <alexandre.alencar at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: <asterisk-r2 at lists.digium.com>
>> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:58:18 -0300
>> To: <asterisk-r2 at lists.digium.com>
>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-r2] Asterisk 1.6.2 is out - oficial MFC/R2 release
>>
>> Hi Anton, how you doing?
>>
>> This is not a just upgrade to new version... as a way to direct
>> efforts for the OpenR2 development, Moises don't support 1.2 and 1.4
>> anymore. You still could make you own backport patch or pay Moises to
>> you it for you and support the project :D
>>
>> The Asterisk 1.6.2 is stable, I am using it since the commit of MFC/R2
>> code on it without problems.
>>
>> Stuck in a no security fix release it's a good reason to upgrade :P
>>
>> best regards
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Anton Krall <antonkrall at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hehehe I know.... But if it works, why fix it? Problem is.... It stopped
>>> working on me :) so time to upgrade.... I always hated those sys admins that
>>> upgrade just because there is a newer version. For me, there should be a
>>> good reason to upgrade, maybe new features (a lot of them not just one) or
>>> bugfix.
>>>
>>> Anyways.... Its time to upgrade :)
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Alexandre Cavalcante Alencar <alexandre.alencar at gmail.com>
>>>> Reply-To: <asterisk-r2 at lists.digium.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:32:51 -0300
>>>> To: <asterisk-r2 at lists.digium.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-r2] Asterisk 1.6.2 is out - oficial MFC/R2 release
>>>>
>>>> HI Anton,
>>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Anton Krall <antonkrall at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Centos version seems to matter on the latest asterisk versions:
>>>>>
>>>>> Centos 4.7 cant compile the latest wanpipe > 3.5
>>>>
>>>> A bit old, CenOS 5.5
>>>>
>>>>> Asterisk 1.2.26
>>>>
>>>> Very old, any real reason to be using it? You should move to a new
>>>> version, a LTS or newer since this version has passed out security fix
>>>> only phase http://www.asterisk.org/asterisk-versions
>>>>
>>>>> Latest zaptel
>>>>
>>>> DAHDI is out for a while
>>>>
>>>>> openr2 1.2.0
>>>>
>>>> Wow something up-to-date
>>>>
>>>>> Equals... Seize timeouts on E1's from telmex, axtel and alestra.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Luc Moreira <lmoreira at dxbrasil.net>
>>>>>> Reply-To: <asterisk-r2 at lists.digium.com>
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:25:05 -0300
>>>>>> To: <asterisk-r2 at lists.digium.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-r2] Asterisk 1.6.2 is out - oficial MFC/R2 release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/12/22 Anton Krall <antonkrall at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Which release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anton
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CentOS 5.1, but Linux flavor doesn't matters. Pick the one up you fell
>>>>>> more comfortable with.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Luc
>>>>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-r2 mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-r2
>



-- 
Alexandre Alencar (Skarmeth)
http://blog.alexandrealencar.net/
http://www.alexandrealencar.net/
ITIL, CSM, LPI, MCP-I, MCP