<html>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
<table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 solid;">
<tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2266/">https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2266/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" style="background-image: url('https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.png'); background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black solid;">
<tr>
<td>
<div>Review request for Asterisk Developers.</div>
<div>By David Lee.</div>
<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated Jan. 10, 2013, 11:09 a.m.</i></p>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Changes</h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Address rmudgett's feedback. Much cleaner :-)</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Masquerades are an insane implementation detail within Asterisk. It generates
a number of useless and confusing events, and manipulates channels in a way
that semantically doesn't make sense. I've given a fairly thorough review of
masquerade code and its usage on the wiki at
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/x/IwBRAQ.
While ultimately it makes the most sense to abandon masquerades altogether,
it will take some time to completely irradicate. Even then, there may always
be code that's not worth rewriting to get rid of the masquerade.
This patch does two things to make masquerades slightly less insane:
* When swapping the names of the original and clone channel, only emit a
single rename event of original -> original<ZOMBIE>. The original code
issued three rename events to accomplish the same end.
* In addition to swapping the names of the channels, also swap their
uniqueid's. This allows the 'Uniqueid' field to be used as a stable
identifier for a channel from and external interface, such as AMI.</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Testing </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">I've run a few SIP transfers and parking scenarios. AMI masquerade events seem
reasonable, and the Uniqueid and Linkedid fields in CELs made more sense.</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> (updated)</h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">
<li>/trunk/UPGRADE.txt <span style="color: grey">(378909)</span></li>
<li>/trunk/include/asterisk/manager.h <span style="color: grey">(378909)</span></li>
<li>/trunk/main/channel.c <span style="color: grey">(378909)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2266/diff/" style="margin-left: 3em;">View Diff</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>