<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Russell Bryant wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:48FCAC94.8020004@digium.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Tilghman Lesher wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sunday 19 October 2008 19:59:08 Vadim Lebedev wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Maybe it's a dumb idea but I wonder,
if the same effect could be achieved by keeping Doxygen format doc and
using some XSLT processing
to transform whatever need to transformed to XML.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the appdocsxml branch
isn't meant to replace developer documentation at all, which will stay as
Doxygen format, but rather to fixup the user-embedded documentation, such that
multiple translations can coexist in the code.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Correct. In addition to translations, having it in a parseable format
will make it easier to take the same information and use it outside of
the code for the purpose of having higher quality, maintainable
user-oriented documentation.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Still it seems, that the desired effect can be achieved by using<br>
doxygen and post processing resulting HTML with XSLT to extract<br>
user-level doc only<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Vadim<br>
</body>
</html>