<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1609" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I found a interesting thing. I wrote a simple dial
plan, Asterisk 1.4 and SVN run different results,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dial plan:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>exten =>
_XXXX.,n,Set(SDS=$["a=b":"a=(\.\+)"])</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>1.4 CLI output:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> -- Executing
[1876543210@GeneralProxy:3] Set("SIP/5064-09bef170", "SDS=b") in new
stack</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>SVN CLI output:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> -- Executing
[1876543210@GeneralProxy:3] Set("SIP/5064-08474f30", "SDS=") in new
stack<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Would anyone please tell me if the regular
expression processing in Asterisk was changed? If it was not, I will
report the bug.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks,</DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Di-Shi Sun<BR>VoIP Routing, Accounting,
Security<BR><A
href="http://www.TransNexus.com">www.TransNexus.com</A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>