[asterisk-dev] Video calling
BJ Weschke
bweschke at btwtech.com
Fri Nov 15 20:14:28 CST 2019
I’ve been using it in several production systems for nearly a year now on the 16 branch and it has yet segfault. My remaining chan_sip Asterisk 13 systems dump code at least once or twice every 3 months or so. I feel very safe saying chan_pjsip is stable enough for my production needs.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 8:38 PM, Troy Bowman <troy at lump.net> wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:56 PM John Kiniston <johnkiniston at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I do not recommend using chan_sip, chan_sip is no longer receiving development.
>> chan_pjsip is where the development focus is at.
>
> Sure, chan_pjsip is where the feature development focus is, but is it truly stable enough for production now? It seems I still see a lot of bug fixes for seemingly constant problems, while chan_sip's code is so mature that it just works hands-off. I'm still afraid of using chan_pjsip in production just like I am still afraid of Linux's btrfs in production, and btrfs has been in development for over a decade.
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20191116/76c87913/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list