[asterisk-dev] Audio to/from Asterisk

[Dan Jenkins]

Just caught up on this - makes sense to me.

DNS is important

transport - WSS to make it easy to just send binary down a WSS and have it
secure.

Dan

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:41 PM Seán C. McCord <ulexus at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds like good reasoning to me.
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 11:23 Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Seán C. McCord wrote:
>> > I don't think checking channel events is too onerous, considering that
>> > IP-based connections would be able to fail, too.
>> >
>> > As far as the ARI API: I don't really care that much, but is there a
>> > reason to not simply use the existing channel tech/target syntax (e.g.
>> > ExternalMedia/media.host.example.com:6645)?
>>
>> Cramming options in the future in a dial string makes things rather
>> unfriendly (see chan_sip) - this is why I pushed for an explicit API to
>> create such a thing. It's also more approachable, and easier to document.
>>
>> --
>> Joshua C. Colp
>> Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer
>> 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
>> Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
>>
>> --
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-dev mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20190816/90bc4e72/attachment.html>