[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3094: res_pjsip_messaging: potential for field values in from/to headers to be missing

[Kevin Harwell]

> On Jan. 8, 2014, 3:21 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
> > Ship It!

Note: per Anthony Messina (issue reporter) -"It seems to me like it's ready to be pushed into branches/12."


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3094/#review10529
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 6, 2014, 12:49 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3094/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 6, 2014, 12:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-22924
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-22924
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added in ability to specify display name format ("name" <sip:name at ipaddr:port>) for a given URI and made sure it was fully propagated to the outgoing message.  This mainly occurred when sending to a direct URI (using the default outbound endpoint).  MESSAGEs sent to/from a valid endpoint will use that endpoint's AOR/contact to fill in the appropriate information.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   branches/12/res/res_pjsip_messaging.c 404949 
>   branches/12/res/res_pjsip.c 404949 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3094/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Some manual testing and also ran the current testsuite tests that exists to make sure everything still worked as expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Harwell
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140108/38fda560/attachment.html>