[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3175: timing: Improve performance for most timing implementations

[Corey Farrell]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3175/#review10763
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



/trunk/include/asterisk/timing.h
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3175/#comment20264>

    Not sure why this isn't a red blob, should be tabbed


- Corey Farrell


On Feb. 5, 2014, 1:17 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3175/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 1:17 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The timing API is currently optimized for the case where timing implementations provide a file descriptor and any API invocations directly act on the file descriptor. In practice this turns out to not be the most common case. Timing implementations commonly store a structure with additional information and then have to use a container lookup on any API invocation to get to it.
> 
> The attached change removes this container lookup requirement by allowing implementations to store a pointer to their data directly. This removes the container lookup and the world is happier.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/res/res_timing_timerfd.c 407425 
>   /trunk/res/res_timing_pthread.c 407425 
>   /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c 407425 
>   /trunk/res/res_timing_dahdi.c 407425 
>   /trunk/main/timing.c 407425 
>   /trunk/include/asterisk/timing.h 407425 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3175/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran the timing test using the various timing implementations on Linux and confirmed they still work. I also placed some calls to a Playback and confirmed it works.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joshua Colp
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140205/3e2dc112/attachment.html>