[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Consider linux-gnuspe as linux-gnu
wdoekes
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Tue Feb 26 02:00:45 CST 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2357/#review7944
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Sounds sane to me.
Although. The * wildcard was just added to cater for `linux-gnueabihf`.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r380522 | mjordan | 2013-01-30 18:49:38 +0100 (Wed, 30 Jan 2013) | 21 lines
Support building Asterisk for Raspberry Pi/Raspbian with hard-float support
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder if we're not back here in a month with `linux-gnulp` or `linux-gnuspehf` or <fill in the blanks>.
Shouldn't we use linux-gnu* instead?
- wdoekes
On Feb. 25, 2013, 2:30 p.m., Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2357/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Feb. 25, 2013, 2:30 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The powerpcspe Linux port uses linux-gnuspe as the OS string.
>
> Our build system shouldn't really care for that, so just call it linux-gnu.
>
> Original report: Roland Stigge , http://bugs.debian.org/701505
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/configure UNKNOWN
> /trunk/configure.ac 382056
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2357/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tzafrir
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130226/139536f9/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list