[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Consider linux-gnuspe as linux-gnu

wdoekes reviewboard at asterisk.org
Tue Feb 26 02:00:45 CST 2013


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2357/#review7944
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Sounds sane to me.


Although. The * wildcard was just added to cater for `linux-gnueabihf`.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r380522 | mjordan | 2013-01-30 18:49:38 +0100 (Wed, 30 Jan 2013) | 21 lines

Support building Asterisk for Raspberry Pi/Raspbian with hard-float support
------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wonder if we're not back here in a month with `linux-gnulp` or `linux-gnuspehf` or <fill in the blanks>.

Shouldn't we use linux-gnu* instead?

- wdoekes


On Feb. 25, 2013, 2:30 p.m., Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2357/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 25, 2013, 2:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The powerpcspe Linux port uses linux-gnuspe as the OS string.
> 
> Our build system shouldn't really care for that, so just call it linux-gnu.
> 
> Original report: Roland Stigge , http://bugs.debian.org/701505
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/configure UNKNOWN 
>   /trunk/configure.ac 382056 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2357/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tzafrir
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130226/139536f9/attachment.htm>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list