[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] RPID not parsed correctly if display-name is *(token LWS)

[opticron]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2341/#review7908
-----------------------------------------------------------



/branches/1.8/channels/chan_sip.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2341/#comment15007>

    I don't think the 0x33 ('3') here is correct.  Perhaps 33 or '!' instead?


- opticron


On Feb. 20, 2013, 5:01 a.m., wdoekes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2341/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 20, 2013, 5:01 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> get_rpid() only allows the quoted-string style display-name.
> 
> Remote-Party-ID    = "Remote-Party-ID" HCOLON rpid *(COMMA rpid)
> rpid               =  [display-name] LAQUOT addr-spec RAQUOT *(SEMI rpi-token)
> display-name       =  *(token LWS)/ quoted-string
> 
> This patch allows *(token LWS) too. (And one without trailing LWS.)
> 
> 
> I could've used the reqresp_parser functions, but I didn't want to change around too much in the 1.8 branch.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-21141.
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21141
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/1.8/channels/chan_sip.c 381817 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2341/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Both
>   Remote-Party-ID: abc <sip:123 at def>;... => "abc"
> and
>   Remote-Party-ID: "abc" <sip:123 at def>;... => "abc"
> work.
> 
> As do:
>   Remote-Party-ID: abc <sip:123 at def>;... => "abc"
>   Remote-Party-ID: abc def <sip:123 at def>;... => "abc def"
>   Remote-Party-ID: abc def<sip:123 at def>;... => "abc def"
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> wdoekes
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130221/bd9013b9/attachment.htm>