[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 2807: Add a reloadable option for sorcery type objects
svnbot
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Fri Aug 30 14:51:53 CDT 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2807/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Aug. 30, 2013, 2:51 p.m.)
Status
------
This change has been marked as submitted.
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Changes
-------
Committed in revision 398139
Bugs: ASTERISK-22382 and ASTERISK-22384
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-22382
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-22384
Repository: Asterisk
Description
-------
Some configuration objects currently won't place nice if reloaded. Specifically, in this case the pjsip transport objects. Now when registering an object in sorcery one may specify that the object is allowed to be reloaded or not. If the object is set to not reload then upon reloading of the configuration the objects of that type will not be reloaded. The initially loaded objects of that type however will remain.
While the transport objects will not longer be reloaded it is still possible for a user to configure an endpoint to an invalid transport. A couple of log messages were added to help diagnose this problem if it occurs.
Diffs
-----
branches/12/res/res_pjsip_outbound_registration.c 398018
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_transport.c 398018
branches/12/include/asterisk/sorcery.h 398018
branches/12/main/sorcery.c 398018
branches/12/res/res_pjsip.c 398018
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2807/diff/
Testing
-------
Ran asterisk with a couple of pjsip endpoints configured for a valid transport. Changed the transport name on the transport type and issued a 'core reload' and observed that the transport was not reloaded and calls could still be made. Then changed the transport name on an endpoint to one that didn't exist and after reloading observed that calls failed, but an error message was logged stating that the transport could not be found. Also verified the reported crash no longer occurred.
Thanks,
Kevin Harwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130830/4f3c4715/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list