[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 2693: ARI: Implement /recordings/stored API's

David Lee reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Aug 28 23:31:03 CDT 2013



> On July 25, 2013, 10:29 a.m., opticron wrote:
> > /trunk/res/stasis_recording/stored.c, line 21
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2693/diff/1/?file=42421#file42421line21>
> >
> >     This appears to be a media indexer of sorts. Was there any reason not to use the one we already have?
> 
> David Lee wrote:
>     It didn't seem appropriate. Specifically, the need for explicitly
>     updating the index as the recordings/registered formats changes does
>     not play well with recordings.
>     
>     There were a few other features that didn't fit well, either.
>     Description processing does not apply. Neither does variants.
>     Multi-format barely applies.
>     
>     Actually...
>     
>     If I modify the indexer to better handle the recordings directory
>     (basically, to build the index on-demand instead of eagerly), it would
>     probably work. I'll give that a go.

Given that both the sounds indexer and recordings will probably get bucket-ified in the near future, I'll just leave this code as-is.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2693/#review9212
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 29, 2013, 5:21 p.m., David Lee wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2693/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 29, 2013, 5:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-21582
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21582
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch implements the ARI API's for stored recordings. While the
> original task only specified deleting a recording, it was simple
> enough to implement the GET for all recordings, and for an individual
> recording.
> 
> The recording playback operation was modified to use the same code for
> accessing the recording as the REST API, so that they will behave
> consistently.
> 
> There were several problems with the api-docs that were also fixed,
> bringing the ARI spec in line with the implementation. There were some
> 'wishful thinking' fields on the stored recording model (duration and
> timestamp) that were removed, because I ended up not implementing a
> metadata file to go along with the recording to store such information.
> 
> The GET /recordings/live operation was removed, since it's not really
> that useful to get a list of all recordings that are currently going
> on in the system. (At least, if we did that, we'd probably want to
> also list all of the current playbacks. Which seems weird.)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/include/asterisk/stasis_app_recording.h 395718 
>   /trunk/res/Makefile 395718 
>   /trunk/res/ari/ari_model_validators.h 395718 
>   /trunk/res/ari/ari_model_validators.c 395718 
>   /trunk/res/ari/resource_recordings.h 395718 
>   /trunk/res/ari/resource_recordings.c 395718 
>   /trunk/res/res_ari_recordings.c 395718 
>   /trunk/res/res_stasis_playback.c 395718 
>   /trunk/res/res_stasis_recording.c 395718 
>   /trunk/res/stasis_recording/stored.c PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/rest-api/api-docs/recordings.json 395718 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2693/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Used Swagger-UI to poke around the API. Verified that you couldn't
> delete anything outside the recording's directory.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Lee
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130829/8274e5cd/attachment.htm>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list