[asterisk-dev] [Code Review]: Fix timeouts for ast_waitfordigit_full
David Lee
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Wed Sep 12 21:26:36 CDT 2012
> On Sept. 12, 2012, 6:09 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote:
> >
Yeah; I'll be sure to read my own patch before my next post.
- David
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2109/#review7054
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Sept. 12, 2012, 9:11 p.m., David Lee wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2109/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2012, 9:11 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Mark Michelson.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> ast_waitfordigit_full would simply pass its timeout to ast_waitfor_nandfds, expecting it to decrement the timeout by however many milliseconds were waited. This is a problem if it consistently waits less than 1ms, the timeout will never be decremented, and we wait... FOREVER!
>
> This patch instead has ast_waitfordigit_full manage the timeout itself.
>
>
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-20375.
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20375
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /branches/1.8/main/channel.c 372975
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2109/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Mark confirmed that with the not-cleaned-up version of this patch, it fixed ASTERISK-20375. The cleanup consisted of changing variable names, adding comments, removing debug logging.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120913/35ce5bbf/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list