[asterisk-dev] Pinequeue - to hold or not to hold

[Leif Madsen]

On 09/05/12 10:28 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1887/
>
> Leif strongly wants to put this on hold, I think it is a great addition as it is and don't think his claim is valid.

I never said put on hold. I suggested that the implementation, based on 
the documentation provided, added what I would consider unexpected 
behaviour by the administrator of the system. Requiring a configuration 
change when a prompt is modified I don't think has precedent.

> I need some consensus on what to do. If the dev team wants to put this on hold, fine, then I won't spend any time on fixing the code according to the rest of the review feedback. If the dev team wants this feature, I will continue to work on it towards a merge into the source code.

If you didn't want to push the issue forward based on my suggestions, 
and other developers didn't feel my suggestion warranted a change in 
behaviour prior to commitment, then there is nothing I could (or would) 
do to stop that. I'm certainly not the stakeholder that has any final 
say. I simply speak for myself, not the development team.

Leif.

-- 
Leif Madsen
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/asterisk