[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] app_directed_pickup Implement the ability to remove a channel group on bridged channel

[Alec Davis]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1118/#review3636
-----------------------------------------------------------


Maybe I don't have enough phones on hand, I would have thought 4 sip phones and 2 DAHDI would be enough..

But ringing multiple sip phones with dial(sip/phone1&sip/phone2) and attempting pickup from the other 2 up with *8, I'm unable to get a deadlock, with 1.8r321211 or trunk.
I do have pickupsounds enabled. if that matters.

But I may not be doing it exactly the same way, that you are able.

- Alec


On 2011-05-26 13:32:29, irroot wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1118/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-05-26 13:32:29)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> as a companion to 0018825 to aid with the move from call-limits to channel group variables. the problem with pickup and queue is that they manage channels outside the dialplan and need "helpers" to deal with channel groups.
> 
> in the case of pickup when a call is placed to a extension with say a "<EXTEN>@called" channel group when it is picked up this needs to be cleared to allow further calls when call waiting is disabled.
> 
> exten => s,n,GotoIf($[$[${ GROUP_COUNT(${ARG1}@called)} >= 1] | $[${GROUP_COUNT(${ARG1}@caller)} >= 1] | $[${GROUP_COUNT(${ARG1}@pickup)} >= 1] | $[${GROUP_COUNT(${ARG1}@qagent)} >= 1]]?s-BUSY,1)
> 
> where
> caller is set when a call is placed.
> called is set when a call is received
> pickup is set when before calling pickup in the dialplan
> qagent is set with patch to queue
> 
> Hope this is found to be useful and finds a home in trunk. 
> 
> not sure what time to put in the "wait for bridge" perhaps there is a better method ?? 
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 18830.
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18830
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/main/channel.c 320937 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1118/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> irroot
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20110527/4dd75aa4/attachment-0001.htm>