[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] SIP user fields are crazy. Repeat extension searches if they all fail and semicolons are obfuscating the extension in the uri.

[Kevin P. Fleming]

On 05/12/2011 05:54 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Olle E. Johansson<oej at edvina.net>  wrote:
>> Bringing this out to the mailing list:
>>
>> Username URI options are just options to the username. We use the username as an extension. I don't see any reason why we should send an option into the dialplan within the extension name. It should be a channel variable that you can read if you want to.
>>
>
> Are we talking about URI parameters or ";something" in the user part
> of the SIP URI? If it's the latter, then they are not parameters and
> we should let them be there.
>
> In this SIP URI:
>
> sip:saghul;test at sip2sip.info
>
> The username is saghul;test according to the grammar:
> http://www.tech-invite.com/Ti-abnf-sip.html#userinfo

We are talking about parameters in the user-part of the URI, not URI 
parameters.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming at digium.com | SIP: kpfleming at digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org