[asterisk-dev] 1.6 vs. 1.8

[CDR]

Please ask matt for details of what happened. I am a user, not a developer.
http://www.venturevoip.com


On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Nick Khamis <symack at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello CDR,
>
> Thank you for your response. We will also be implementing a high speed
> dialer. But we
> really want to adapt the newer versions with their enhancements etc...
> If I am not mistaken
> in terms of concurrent calls, 1.4 is at ~250, and the newer versions
> can handle double that?
> When you say that the dialer did not work when testing with 1.6, do
> you know where the
> newer version fell short?
>
> Thanks in Advance,
>
> Nick.
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:00 AM, CDR <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:
>> My 2 cents on the issue of what version of Asterisk to use. The dialer
>> that we use for high speed calling, made by
>> http://www.venturevoip.com, and supported fabulously by Matt Riddell
>> (Matt Riddell <matt at venturevoip.com>), still uses 1.4. We tried to use
>> 1.6 and the dialer did not work. So something is still better in 1.4
>> that has not been replicated in the next versions. If you want find
>> out why exactly Matt is till using 1.4, please write to him.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Nick Khamis <symack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Coorect me if I am wrong, but using 1.4 we miss out on all the latest features
>>> such as the enhancements in answering machine detection, increases in
>>> concurrent calls etc..?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your answer!
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:55 AM, anguri sudhakar
>>> <angurisudhakar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi ,
>>>>
>>>> Just use Asterisk 1.4. this is also stable version....
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Nick Khamis <symack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> We are looking to switch our telephone services from legacy to sip. We
>>>>> have approx. 8,000,000 customers worldwide, and growing
>>>>> rapidly. Looking at some of the emails to this user list, I get
>>>>> worried when seeing subject lines like "asterisk freezes when full
>>>>> load etc...". What we are looking for is a stable platform that will
>>>>> allow us to offer our reliable carrier grad service. My question is
>>>>> "to start" 1.6 or 1.8?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick Khamis
>>>>> Toronto Hydro Telecom
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>>>
>>>>> asterisk-dev mailing list
>>>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> sudhakar anguri
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>>
>>>> asterisk-dev mailing list
>>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>
>>> asterisk-dev mailing list
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>>
>>
>> --
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-dev mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>