[asterisk-dev] [Code Review]: Some cleanups for the recently commited T38 Gw timeout option
irroot
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Mon Aug 29 09:27:58 CDT 2011
> On Aug. 29, 2011, 8:52 a.m., Matthew Nicholson wrote:
> > /branches/10/res/res_fax.c, line 2426
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1385/diff/1/?file=19205#file19205line2426>
> >
> > This is here so that when a gateway_timeout is set, a session is reserved. If the timeout is disabled, then no session will be reserved.
>
> irroot wrote:
> gwtimeout = no sets this to 0 ??
Problem here is if FAXOPT(gwtimeout)=no is called then then FAXOPT(gateway)=yes the framehook will never be started.
- irroot
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1385/#review4159
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Aug. 29, 2011, 8:30 a.m., irroot wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1385/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Aug. 29, 2011, 8:30 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Matthew Nicholson.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Recent Changes to res_fax.c to support configurable timeout is not optimal here is a fixup.
>
>
> This addresses bug ASTERISK-18219.
> https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18219
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /branches/10/res/res_fax.c 333337
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1385/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> irroot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20110829/3c229af5/attachment.htm>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list