[asterisk-dev] Manger inconsistency: ASTERISK-17455

[Jared Smith]

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net> wrote:
> Any way, this raises the question on why we have a version number for AMI. I think this is a case where changing the number again would make life easier. No one mentioned it in this thread, so obviously very few bother with checking AMI version numbers. Should we remove it or actually start using it?

Let's use it!  I'm all for incrementing the AMI version number for
changes like this.

--
Jared Smith