[asterisk-dev] Asterisk 1.8: H323 requirements, ptlib and h323plus

[bilal ghayyad]

Dear Tony;

Thanks alot for your reply.

So does this mean, the normal h323 that is coming with Asterisk 1.8 will not work?

Because actually I compiled ptlib and h323plus and configured the path (PTLIBDIR and OPENH323DIR), but I when run ./configure for asterisk it does not detect the h323 (also the samething when running make menuselect, it does not detect the h323 channel).

If that the case, then no need to try with default h323 .. But I would like to confirm this.

Any confirm to help me?
Regards
Bilal

> > Hi All;
> > 
> > I need to have H323 channel with Asterisk 1.8, so do I
> have to use ptlib with h323plus or I
> > have to use pwlib and open323 because pwlib and
> openh323 is becoming OLD and no more
> > maintenance for it.
> > 
> > In case I am going to use ptlib with h323plus, then
> the paths are going to be as following:
> > 
> > PTLIBDIR
> > H323PLUSDIR
> > 
> > So it will work or not?
> 
> For H.323, try using the ooh323c module in addons/ first;
> it doesn't
> need any external libraries.
> 
> Cheers
> Tony
> -- 
> Tony Mountifield
> Work: tony at softins.co.uk
> - http://www.softins.co.uk
> Play: tony at mountifield.org
> - http://tony.mountifield.org
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:36:03 -0400
> From: Rod Dorman <rodd at polylogics.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] Top posting - there is no
> rule.
> Cc: 'Asterisk Developers Mailing List' <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <1033277034.20110403123603 at polylogics.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
> 
> On Sunday, April 3, 2011, 02:46:51, Alec Davis wrote:
> > What's with the occasional "Un-Top-posting", there is
> no rule that says you
> > can't, http://www.asterisk.org/community/rules
> 
> Rules
>   5. Responses should be placed under the original
> quoted text.
> 
> > My preference is top posting, as you see the answer at
> a quick glance,
> > instead of reaching for the scroll bar (or whatever
> key stokes are required)
> > to get to the bottom, to find that the answer isn't
> there yet.
> 
> My preference for in-line responses is two fold:
> a) when replying to more that one point the reply is
> directly below the
>    discussion its in response to
> b) after several go-rounds its much easier to read the
> discussion from
>    beginning to end
> 
> -- 
> rodd at polylogics.com
> Rod Dorman
>    A: Because it messes up the order in
> which people normally read text.
>    Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>    A: Top-posting.
>    Q: What is the most annoying thing in
> e-mail?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> AstriCon 2010 - October 26-28 Washington, DC
> Put in your talk proposal: http://www.bit.ly/speak-astricon2010
> 
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 
> End of asterisk-dev Digest, Vol 81, Issue 3
> *******************************************
>