[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] SIP: for an INVITE transaction, treat all 2XX responses the same as a 200

[David Vossel]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej at edvina.net>
> To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:05:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] SIP: for an INVITE transaction, treat all 2XX responses the same as a 200
> 23 sep 2010 kl. 17.13 skrev Simon Perreault:
> 
> > On 2010-09-23 11:01, David Vossel wrote:
> >> A 202 for an INVITE does not really make sense to me. Since it is
> >> not
> >> recognized for an INVITE, RFC 3261 says we should process it like a
> >> 200 in section 8.1.3.2
> >
> > My interpretation of the RFC is not the same as yours, but I also
> > understand your point of view. I think this would be a good question
> > for
> > sip-implementors at lists.cs.columbia.edu.
> 
> My question here is really if this is just theory or if anyone has
> seen anything else than 200 OK in the 2xx
> class for an INVITE?
> 
> Curious.
> /O
> --

This will never happen, but it is theoretically correct .

David Vossel
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer, Open Source Software
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
The_Boy_Wonder in #asterisk-dev