[asterisk-dev] MixMonitor Bug - $1500(USD) Bounty

[Klaus Darilion]

Am 23.03.2010 17:08, schrieb Geoffrey Mina:
> I haven't tried calling Answer() after MixMonitor... I also haven't
> tried using the straight Monitor() to see what the different legs are
> doing.  Either way, it's a bit inconsequential... since I am offering to
> pay someone to fix it :)

Ususally it is easier to fix if you know where/what to fix. My 
suggestions are just some tests to narrow down the bug.

regards
klaus



> thanks.
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Klaus Darilion
> <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at <mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>> wrote:
>
>     Just a few comments ...
>
>     Does it make a difference if you Answer the call after MixMonitor?
>
>     Have you tried Monitor() instead of MixMonitor and check each leg
>     separately?
>
>     btw: what does monitor if a channel uses VAD and thus there are no
>     frames sent for some time? Will it record silence or will it just
>     write each frame after the previous one (thus skipping the silence)?
>
>     klaus
>
>     Am 23.03.2010 14:47, schrieb Geoffrey Mina:
>
>         I am offering a $1500(USD) bounty for anyone willing to fix the
>         following bug in the 1.4 branch of app_mixmonitor.
>
>         https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17078
>
>         It seems like it should be relatively simple... so hopefully
>         this should
>         be easy money for someone.
>
>         I would need a patch for both 1.4.30 and 1.4.26.
>
>         thanks.
>
>
>