[asterisk-dev] Strange code in chan_sip.c (1.4) sip_xmit - network retry in 1 ms on REGISTER socket failures
Olle E. Johansson
oej at edvina.net
Mon Sep 7 11:07:20 CDT 2009
7 sep 2009 kl. 18.02 skrev Klaus Darilion:
> Hi Olle!
>
> That might be the cause of the problem I reported some time ago:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com/
> msg38618.html
>
Yes, it is. That code needs to be fixed soon. Follow the bug report :-)
/O
> regards
> klaus
>
> Olle E. Johansson schrieb:
>> 1818 /*! \brief Transmit SIP message */
>> 1819 static int __sip_xmit(struct sip_pvt *p, char *data, int len)
>> 1820 {
>> 1821 int res;
>> 1822 const struct sockaddr_in *dst = sip_real_dst(p);
>> 1823 res = sendto(sipsock, data, len, 0, (const struct
>> sockaddr *)dst, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) ;
>> 1824
>> 1825 if (res == -1) {
>> 1826 switch (errno) { 1827 case
>> EBADF: /* Bad file descriptor - seems like this is
>> generated when th e host exist, but doesn't accept the UDP
>> packet
>> */
>> 1828 case EHOSTUNREACH: /* Host can't be
>> reached */
>> 1829 case ENETDOWN: /* Inteface down */
>> 1830 case ENETUNREACH: /* Network failure */
>> 1831 case ECONNREFUSED: /* ICMP port
>> unreachable */
>> 1832 res = XMIT_ERROR; /* Don't bother
>> with trying to transmit again */
>> 1833 }
>> 1834
>> 1835 if (p->registry && p->registry->regstate <
>> REG_STATE_REGISTERED) {
>> 1836 AST_SCHED_DEL(sched, p->registry-
>>> timeout);
>> 1837 p->registry->needdns = TRUE;
>> 1838 p->registry->timeout =
>> ast_sched_add(sched, 1, sip_reg_timeout, p->registry);
>> 1839 }
>> 1840 }
>>
>>
>> Since I don't have access to svnview, it's too hard to trace when the
>> lines 1835-1839 was added. Somehow it reschedules a REGISTER in the
>> middle of the "send to socket" function, bypassing a lot of other
>> code
>> that handles errors on this layer. It's extremely aggressive. What
>> kind of network-related errors would possibly be resolved in 1 ms and
>> can't wait for normal SIP retransmit?
>>
>> I need to understand where this is coming from and why, since there's
>> a bug report in https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15540.
>>
>> I think we should propably just remove it or move it somewhere else.
>> For some reason, it doesn't exist at all in 1.6 or trunk.
>>
>> /O
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>>
>> AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>> asterisk-dev mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
---
* Olle E Johansson - oej at edvina.net
* Cell phone +46 70 593 68 51, Office +46 8 96 40 20, Sweden
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list