[asterisk-dev] Platform decision ...
Mauro Sergio Ferreira Brasil
mauro.brasil at tqi.com.br
Tue Aug 18 10:08:45 CDT 2009
Hello there!
During some research on Internet I found the following comparison on
site Voip-Info (see, "http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/OpenPBX.org+FAQ"):
What does CallWeaver have that Asterisk doesn't?
* Official cross-platform support, currently Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD
and MacOS X
* Conferencing without Zaptel hardware and without any kernel
modules for timing
* Built-in STUN support for SIP NAT traversal
* Uses SpanDSP which means more efficient codecs and full T.38 fax
over IP support
* Uses SQLite instead of the (no longer maintained) Berkeley DB1
engine as its internal database
* Allows CSRC entries in RTP for better compliance
* A universal jitterbuffer for use with any channel type
* Uses POSIX realtime extensions which means there are no Zaptel
timing dependencies
* Much faster and more efficient dialplan execution because it uses
hashing
* Much faster and more efficient extension matching engine
* Variables and applications in extensions.conf are case sensitive,
CallWeaver How to use the dialplan checking and conversion script
* AGI has been renamed to OGI, Macro() has been renamed to Proc(),
CallWeaver How to use the dialplan checking and conversion script
* Evaluates correctness and integrity of configuration data (being
introduced in stages, work in progress)
* Provides conversion scripts to convert configuration files
whenever changes are made to format or syntax
* Runs well under a virtual machine such as Xen, VMware and VPS
What does Asterisk 1.4 have that CallWeaver 1.2 doesn't?
* A vendor who has the last word on all decisions concerning the
code base
* A bugtracker where people get punished for reporting serious bugs
which are difficult to fix
* A licensing regime under which contributors who wish to contribute
under GPL terms are rejected
* Variable packetization
* SNMP support
We were considering Asterisk as the chosen platform, but after reading
this I got a little confused.
The comparison considers 1.4 old version of Asterisk.
So, can someone give me an update on what CallWeaver DO provide and
Asterisk DONT topic considering new 1.6 version ?
Maybe someone can point me a site with an updated comparison.
As long as I could see by now SpanDSP is present on new version of
Asterisk, so this item isn't a difference any more. Right ?
Thanks and best regards,
--
__At.,
_
*Technology and Quality on Information*
Mauro Sérgio Ferreira Brasil
Coordenador de Projetos e Analista de Sistemas
+ mauro.brasil at tqi.com.br <mailto:@tqi.com.br>
: www.tqi.com.br <http://www.tqi.com.br>
( + 55 (34)3291-1700
( + 55 (34)9971-2572
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list