[asterisk-dev] 1.6.0.13: sounds 1.4.14, but rc2 was 1.4.15

Tilghman Lesher tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com
Wed Aug 12 16:40:00 CDT 2009


On Wednesday 12 August 2009 15:22:27 sean darcy wrote:
> Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 August 2009 04:40:02 Russell Bryant wrote:
> >> sean darcy wrote:
> >>> 1.6.0.13:
> >>>
> >>> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/asterisk/asterisk-1.6.0.13/sounds'
> >>> --20:56:18--
> >>> http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/sounds/releases/asterisk-core
> >>>-s ounds-en-wav-1.4.14.tar.gz =>
> >>> `asterisk-core-sounds-en-wav-1.4.14.tar.gz'
> >>>
> >>> but in 1.6.0.11-rc2 it used 1.4.15.
> >>>
> >>> Any reason for this change?
> >>
> >> Yeah, it has to do with the release numbering becoming a bit confusing
> >> due to an unexpected security release.
> >>
> >> 1.6.0.11 was in the RC state, and then we had to make a security
> >> release.  We didn't want to call it 1.6.0.11, as it doesn't include all
> >> of the bug fixes that were staged to be released as 1.6.0.11 as
> >> indicated by the release candidates.  So, instead, we went to the next
> >> version number.  There was a build error with 1.6.0.12, so it became
> >> 1.6.0.13.
> >>
> >> Now, we'll push out a 1.6.0.14-rc1, which will be a continuation of the
> >> release candidate series that was originally going to be 1.6.0.11.
> >>
> >> Hopefully that makes sense.
> >
> > Actually, Russell, I think he's asking about the asterisk-sounds release
> > moving back a version, not the Asterisk versioning.  The reason for the
> > -sounds release staying at 1.4.14 is that the 1.6.0.13 release is an
> > EXACT copy of 1.6.0.10, plus the security fixes.  That is, we don't
> > change anything else in a security release, from the previous full
> > release.  Given that 1.6.0.11-rc2 was not a full release, but merely a
> > release candidate, the changes introduced in that version won't be seen
> > in a security release until there's been a full release with those
> > changes.  The version of sounds tarball is indicated in the sounds
> > directory Makefile, which is not something that typically changes during
> > a security release.
>
> BTW, unless I missed it, there's no announcement of 1.6.0.13.

Given another announcement is pending with the release candidates,
I opted to hold off the 1.6.0.13 announcement until then.

-- 
Tilghman & Teryl
with Peter, Cottontail, Midnight, Thumper, & Johnny (bunnies)
and Harry, BB, & George (dogs)



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list