[asterisk-dev] Defining new section type in sip.conf - question about syntax

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:51:31PM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> 
> > Just to clarify things:
> > 
> > Do you think that there's any use for:
> > 
> > [common](!)
> > <some stuff>
> > 
> > [example.org](common)
> > type = domain
> > <domain stuff>
> > 
> > [peer-example](common)
> > type = peer
> > <peer stuff>
> 
> Probably not; it's doubtful that domain and peer entries will share any
> configuration variables, and if they do, they might not share the same
> semantics (although we'd try to avoid that).

Following the rest of the thread: 

will it useful to have:

[general]
<some stuff>

[example.org](general)
type = domain
<other stuff>


(Again, to see if there are some arguments for keeping it within
sip.conf)


-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir