[asterisk-dev] [svn-commits at lists.digium.com: [svn-commits] dhubbard: branch 1.4 r112689 - /branches/1.4/main/asterisk.c]

[Kevin P. Fleming]

John Todd wrote:

>    Yes, I think that would be a reasonable method of startup, if that 
> is the way it works now (if not, then if it were to change to that 
> method it would be suitable.)  That addresses my primary concern of 
> Asterisk unexpectedly not starting based on external problems (span 
> outages.)  If the card is configured correctly, even with no spans 
> attached or spans down, Asterisk will still start up and provide 
> timing from the card.

I've entered an issue in our internal issue tracker to have our primary
Zaptel developers take a look at this issue and see what can be done.