[asterisk-dev] AMI command for SIP Notify

[Igor A. Goncharovsky]

Tilghman Lesher wrote:
>> OK, SIPdevice looks like good name. As I know there are no same
>> techology for other protocols and therefore no need to use peer name
>> with technology.
>> Also question: is it need to make response with confirmation of notify
>> sent? I think yes, when we get 200 OK from device.    
> >From a top-down perspective, we have really been trying to get away from
> customized parameter names in the manager.  Custom names are fine
> for the Event name, but we'd like to see you use common parameter names.
> So I'd prefer something along the following lines:
>
> Action: SIPnotify
> Notify: <notify-type>
> PeerCount: 3
> Peer: <sip-peer-name-1>
> Peer: <sip-peer-name-2>
> Peer: <sip-peer-name-3>
>
> with, of course, PeerCount defaulting to 1, if not specified.  That's
> backwards compatible to the current Notify event.  There is no prohibition
> in the normal manager against having multiple parameters with the same
> name.
>   
Hmm, I didn'n find anything about Notify event. What is it for?
Is it really need to use here PeerCount? Using astman_get_variables we
can get all values of Peer without this information.

--
Best regards,
Goncharovsky Igor