[Asterisk-Dev] is zttest actually working ?

[Matt Riddell]

Zoa wrote:
> 
> I tried to look for it on google, lots of people think its not working
> as it should be,
> is there some consensus on this ?
> 
> I tried to have zttest run on a dozen asterisk servers, only the cheap
> as single cpu models have 100%. Every single dual cpu processor i tried,
> dual xeon and dual opteron  ( i tried 4) will almost always give
> 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%.
> 
> - is the zttest approach a reliable way of checking the interrupt 
> handling ?
> - shouldnt zttest return 99,987783 as the normal, and 100% as being bad ?
> 
> Zoa.

I ran it against a newish Fujitsu Siemens tower with an X100P in it. 
100% all the way.  This was before NMI Errors from having the X100P in 
there crashed the network card.

Here's the results from my HomePABX (which is running about 5,000,000 
different services).  It contains an X100P and a T100P:

[root at pabx zaptel]# ./zttest
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
99.987793% 100.000000% 100.000000% 99.987793% 100.000000% 100.000000% 
100.000000%
100.000000% 99.987793% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 
99.987793% 100.000000%
99.987793% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 99.987793% 100.000000% 
100.000000% 100.000000%
99.987793% 100.000000% 99.987793% 100.000000% 100.000000% 99.987793%
--- Results after 29 passes ---
Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.987793 -- Average: 99.996212
[root at pabx zaptel]#


-- 
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
_______________________________________________

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)