[Asterisk-Dev] Loss of functionality with depreciation of DBGet/Put?

[Brian West]

> I saw the proposal with ${x=DB(CFIM/200)}... I think that might be  
> a good solution, setting a variable _and_ returning its new value.

I don't think that's a good way yet.  A SET function would be more  
elegant and fall in line with the rest of that.  If you do this  
format then why not allow ${x++} or other such methods.

/b