[Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver

[Zoa]

Because both are as broken as they can possibly get. imho.
Never got any of both to work stable under heavy load.

/Z

Tony Mountifield wrote:

>In article <4281B0A0.5020300 at securax.org>, Zoa <zoachien at securax.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Tony Mountifield wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In article <DE79A5C0-17D4-460D-AA1D-0F85680D2B95 at mac.com>,
>>>Brian West <brian.west at mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4234
>>>>
>>>>If anyone wants to give it a shot.. help test it.. right now it only
>>>>supports ULAW and GSM with more capabilities being added by ObjSys.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>What advantages will this driver have over the existing chan_h323
>>>and chan_oh323?
>>>
>>>
>>It might actually work.
>>
>>
>
>I couldn't get chan_h323 to work on CVS-STABLE, but chan_oh323 appears
>to work pretty well (even if it is hungry for FDs).
>
>I'd still like to understand the reason for producing a new driver
>instead of improving the existing driver(s).
>
>Cheers
>Tony
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20050511/7e72e10f/signature.pgp